Keira Knightley Won Thousands After Being Accused Of Being Responsible For A Teen's Death

Highlights

• Keira Knightley sued The Daily Mail for falsely blaming her for a teen's death, and was once awarded £3,000 in damages.
• Knightley donated her winnings to the charity Beat.
• The Daily Mail printed an apology and admitted that Knightley wasn't responsible.

Once other folks become well-known, they extra often than not transform objectives before too lengthy. A absolute best example of that is the fact that Keanu Reeves was once sued for millions for supposedly unpaid child fortify.

In Keira Knightley's case, she was additionally focused when she was accused of being responsible for a teen's death. Even regardless that Knightley is rich and she lives on a budget, she still took those that made that claim to court and got thousands of bucks.

Keira Knightley Beat The Daily Mail In Court

After rising to popularity in 2003, Keira Knightley has been in the highlight to 1 degree or another ever since. While that may be a great thing, popularity surely will have a dark aspect too. In 2007, issues got especially dark for Knightley when she was blamed for a teen's death.

Throughout Knightley's time in the public eye, there have been a lot of headlines about her physique. In many circumstances, there have been articles published claiming that Knightley had an consuming disorder which have been written by way of people who had no private wisdom of the actor.

What different celebrities have won proceedings towards The Daily Mail?

While that has been lovely common, in 2007 issues were taken to a whole new and anxious degree. On January eleventh, 2007, The Daily Mail published an editorial fascinated by Knightley that made a truly shocking declare about her.

To be in contact how shocking that article was, all anyone has to do is quote the title of the piece. "If pictures like this one of Keira carried a health warning, my darling daughter might have lived."

Was Adam Sandler Almost Sued For Plagiarism By This Popular Kids' Books Company?

Alongside that eye-grabbing headline, The Daily Mail's article featured a image of the actor wearing a bikini on a seaside. The article that appeared under that headline and picture fascinated about a teenager girl named Sophie Mazurek who tragically kicked the bucket. Of course, the object connected that teen's tragic passing to Knightley.

It is also value noting that the January 11th article was some distance from the primary time The Daily Mail body-shamed Knightley. In reality, handiest 3 days previous, The Daily Mail revealed a piece of writing with the headline "It's itsy bitsy teeny weeny Keira Knightley".

In each of those two articles, The Daily Mail accused Knightley of having an eating disorder. Following the item from January eighth, Knightley didn't sue the e-newsletter. Instead, Knightley only took felony motion after being accused of being responsible for a teen's passing.

Given the outrageous nature of The Daily Mail's headlines, it likely won't wonder anyone that Knightley won in court docket. While Knightley prevailed over the newsletter, she was only awarded £3,000 in damages. According to a Denver Post article from that point, Knightley's damages were worth roughly $6,000 in United States Dollars.

According to Celebrity Net Worth, Keira Knightley has an $80 million fortune as of this writing.

When Knightley took The Daily Mail to courtroom, she didn't try to get wealthy from the placement. Instead, Knightley used to be handiest excited about making a level about how irresponsible she felt The Daily Mail's reporting about her had been.

As The Guardian's article concerning the lawsuit ending revealed, Knightley donated her winnings to charity. Knightley if truth be told doubled the quantity she donated as she gave some of her own cash as well.

Jean-Claude Van Damme Was Sued For Injuring A Co-Star, But How Much Did He Have To Pay?

"Knightley's £3,000 damages will be donated to a charity, the eating disorder and mental illness charity, Beat. Knightley will also match the damages sum being donated to Beat."

Seemingly more importantly for Knightley, The Daily Mail agreed to publish an apology. Additionally, the newsletter apologized in court docket which was once quoted by way of The Guardian's article.

"The defendant sought to publish an article which it considered to be in the public interest as it concerned an important debate and wished to alert mothers to the dangers of anorexia. It understands that the claimant acknowledges the importance of that debate. However, through me, the defendant accepts that the claimant does not bear responsibility for Sophie's death, does not have an eating disorder, and has not misled the public."

After Knightley's lawsuit towards The Daily Mail ended, her lawyer read a statement in courtroom which used to be summarized via The Guardian.

"Knightley's solicitor Simon Smith also read a statement describing the January 11 article as 'entirely false'. He added that the actress found the suggestions all the more offensive as she had admitted publicly in the past that a member of her family suffered from anorexia and she was aware of the devastating effects eating disorders could have."

Knightley's lawyer additionally expressed the actor's sympathies for the circle of relatives of Sophie Mazurek.

"Mr Smith added that Knightley had, through her lawyers, offered her sincere sympathies to Ms Mazurek's mother and family for what was obviously a tragic and distressing loss for them."

Keira Knightley Has Spoken Out About Being Body-Shamed

In the 12 months 2004, Keira Knightley starred in a mostly forgotten movie titled King Arthur. While that movie wasn't a entire flop, for many people probably the most memorable thing in regards to the film used to be the backlash that the movie's poster impressed.

Keira Knightley's $80 Million Net Worth Was Built By These Insane And Oddly Consistent Movie Salaries

When the poster for King Arthur was launched, it didn't take lengthy for other folks to notice that Knightley's chest was photoshopped to be bigger. Years later, Knightley would pose for a topless photoshoot. During an interview about that photoshoot, Knightley explained that she agreed to it to address how her body had been altered by others through the years.

"I’ve had my body manipulated so many different times for so many different reasons, whether it’s paparazzi photographers or for film posters. That [shoot] was one of the ones where I said: "OK, I’m positive doing the topless shot so long as you don’t lead them to any bigger or retouch." Because it does feel important to say it really doesn’t matter what shape you are."

Also, all over that same interview, Knightley expressed her opinion about how ladies in the media are judged for their our bodies. "I think women’s bodies are a battleground and photography is partly to blame. Our society is so photographic now, it becomes more difficult to see all of those different varieties of shape."

In 2014, Knightley used to be interviewed by means of Elle UK. During that interview, Knightley was extraordinarily blunt about how her body had been talked about when she was interviewed.

"There was a very long time when [interviewers] were all: 'Well you’re a sh*t actress and you’re anorexic and people hate you' which, for a teenager or somebody in their early 20s, is a very strange thing."

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTErZ%2Bippeoe6S7zGiinqGilnqsusign62kla56pa3IpbBmpZGeuW64wLCqrqGkYrKiwMinnmacmai8s7DEq2StnZWjeqWxwK2faA%3D%3D